Today, we will discuss how Donald Trump may have started seeing through the façade of Vladimir Putin’s endless game of bluffs while negotiating with the United States. Despite his efforts to achieve progress, Trump now seems to understand that Russia’s real intention is to prolong negotiations as long as needed to reach its goals on the battlefield.

In the early months of 2025, Russia presented a façade of willingness to engage in peace negotiations with Ukraine, signaling to the Trump administration an openness to dialogue. However, behind closed doors, Russia consistently introduced new preconditions, effectively stalling the peace process. This strategy appeared aimed at buying time to achieve military objectives on the ground, rather than pursuing a genuine resolution to the war.

Russia is prolonging any potential negotiations with new pretexts because, before a peace deal becomes final, it aims to achieve several goals. The first is to take control of Pokrovsk, despite their difficulties and recently shifted focus to the south. Secondly, advancing to the Oskil River would provide Russia with more defensible positions and eliminate Ukrainian footholds that could serve as launch points for future counteroffensives in the Kharkiv and Luhansk regions. Thirdly, capturing key fortress cities, like Kostiantynivka, would further solidify Russian control over Donetsk Oblast.

Despite past optimism, President Donald Trump began expressing frustration with Russia's approach to the negotiations. In a candid moment, he acknowledged that Russia may be dragging their feet, as he suggested that Russia was not negotiating in good faith. Trump's impatience grew as he faced mounting pressure to fulfill his campaign promise of ending the war swiftly.

The breaking point came after Trump's self-imposed 100-day deadline to broker a peace deal passed, without significant progress. Following a private 15-minute conversation with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy during Pope Francis's funeral in Rome, Trump openly admitted that he believed Putin was stalling the negotiations. He criticized recent Russian missile and drone attacks on Ukrainian cities and the civilian population, which undermined the credibility of Russia's commitment to peace. Trump is also not the only one to start to see through Russian deceptions, including senators from Trump’s Republican party, who warned that Putin is taking the United States for a fool, threatening a bill imposing crushing secondary sanctions on Russia. In response to this very public dissatisfaction, Russia attempted to salvage the situation by communicating in a meeting with Trump’s envoy, Steve Witkoff, that they may be ready to engage in peace talks without preconditions.

The next Russian attempt to please Trump was later made by announcing a three-day ceasefire from May 8 to 10, coinciding with Russian World War Two Victory Day celebrations. Putin again stated alleged readiness to peace talks "without preconditions," but warned of responding to any Ukrainian ceasefire violations.


However, many Ukrainian officials, including President Zelenskyy, dismissed the truce as a deceptive tactic, once again aimed at misleading the United States. Zelenskyy reiterated Ukraine’s acceptance of a 30-day ceasefire proposal from the U.S., which Russia had rejected by setting extensive preconditions.


Despite apparent Russian moves toward a ceasefire, many military analysts suggested that the Victory Day proposal was a tactical move to deflect potential embarrassment during ceremonial events and offer relief to Russian forces, rather than a genuine step toward peace. The well-documented pattern of Russia's behavior, agreeing to temporary truces only to violate them shortly after, further erodes trust in the negotiation process.
As the situation evolves and Russia repeats its preconditions, it gets increasingly clear that Russia's primary objective is to prolong the war to achieve its military goals, rather than to engage in sincere peace talks. Trump's initial belief in Putin's commitment to a deal wanes as evidence of Russia's duplicity mounts with each week gone by without true progress. The U.S. administration now faces a critical decision: to continue pursuing negotiations with a partner acting in bad faith or to reevaluate its approach to support Ukraine.

Overall, Russia's strategy of showing false interest in peace negotiations while pursuing aggressive military objectives has become increasingly transparent. Trump's growing frustration and public criticism of Putin's tactics underscore the challenges of negotiating with a regime that consistently undermines any attempts to negotiate in good faith.

Comments